PAGE UNDER CONSTRUCTION
BOOKMARK IT AND CHECK BACK SOON
One Community is designing an open source and free-shared Duplicable City Center® to save resources and help model a redefinition of how people choose to live. This page will explain the process of calculating and designing all the structural engineering details with the following sections:
Placeholder text….
Placeholder text…
SUGGESTIONS ● CONSULTING ● MEMBERSHIP ● OTHER OPTIONS
Haoxuan “Hayes” Lei: Structural Engineer
Jin Yu: Structural Engineering Designer
Shuna Ni: Structural Engineer
Details coming…
One Community is designing an open source and free-shared Duplicable City Center® to help model a redefinition of how people choose to live, save resources, and function as a revenue generator and starting point for DIY and replicable sustainable city construction. It will open source 15 different templates and function as a recreation center, large-scale dining hall, large-scale laundry facility, and alternative for visitors that might not (at first) be comfortable staying in the Earthbag Village or Straw Bale Village.
Once complete, the Duplicable City Center will be the largest open source/DIY structure in the world. As part of One Community, it will be a diversely functional, ultra-eco-friendly (LEED Platinum Certifiable), space and resource saving community center designed to be replicated. It is meant to be (but doesn’t need to be) built as the central and/or starting point of any one of the seven (7) One Community sustainable village models. Its purpose is to support a redefinition of how people live by providing a space more beautiful than most people’s homes that replaces the need for individual kitchens, living rooms, laundry rooms, and other in-home recreation spaces. It is also purposed to function in conjunction with One Community’s open source nonprofit and for-profit business models as both a non-profit teacher/demonstration community, village, or city center and/or the central structure of an eco-tourism destination. To our knowledge, it will also be the first open source and DIY commercial building ever to be built.
Building a duplicable city center is an opportunity for people to improve their way of living through investing resources in shared space. As part of One Community’s 4-phase global change strategy, we will demonstrate building a city center like this as providing five (5) primary benefits:
In traditional society, each family home contains space for socializing with friends, preparing and eating meals, and doing laundry. We believe that we will save significant space and resources by providing shared access to a high-quality environment for these activities within our City Center instead. This, in accordance with our global change methodology, creates another path to the One Community global-change model spreading on its own. Here’s a video tour of the structure and why we think people will be happy for this alternative to traditional housing models:
The Duplicable City Center Open Source Portal (Collaborative resource and information hub)
2.1. Codes and Regulations
2.1.1. Federal/National Regulations
2.1.2. State and Local Authorities Regulations
2.1.2.1 City of Los Angeles – Los Angeles Building Code (LABC) 2017 (If applicable)
2.1.2.2 California Building Code (CBC 2019)
2.1.2.3 Local Building and Safety Officials for City or County
2.1.2.4 California Fire Code (CFC 2016), Title 24, Part 9
2.1.2.5 California Plumbing Code (CPC 2016), Title 24, Part 5
2.1.3. Steel and Cold Form Design
2.1.3.1 Code of Standard Practice for Steel Buildings and Bridges (AISC 303-16). Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction, 2010
2.1.3.2 Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (AISC 360-10). Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction, 2010
2.1.3.3 Seismic Provision for Structural Steel Buildings (AISC 341-10). Chicago, IL: American Institute of Steel Construction, 2010
2.1.3.4 Steel Construction Manual 15th Edition
2.1.3.5 AISC 326 – Detailing for Steel Construction
2.1.3.6 Specification for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts
2.1.3.7 AISI SG 673, Part I – Specification for the Design for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members
2.1.3.8 Steel Deck Institute – SDI Design Manual for Composite Decks, Form Decks and Roof Decks – No. 31
2.1.4. Concrete and Masonry Design
2.1.4.1 American Concrete Institute ACI 318-14 – Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and commentary
2.1.4.2 American Concrete Institute ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402 – Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures
2.1.4.3 American Concrete Institute (ACI) – ACI 330R – Guide for the Design and Construction of Concrete Parking Lots
2.1.4.4 American Concrete Institute (ACI) – ACI 304R – Guide for Measuring, Mixing, Transporting, and Placing Concrete, 2009
2.1.5. Wood Design
2.1.5.1 American Wood Council, Code Conforming Wood Design
2.1.5.2 American Wood Council, National Design Specification (NDS)
2.1.5.3 American Wood Council, Special Design Provisions for Wind and Seismic
2.2. Standards, Specifications, and Material Specifications
2.2.1. Material Specifications
2.2.2. International Code Council, ICC G2 – 2010 “Guideline for Acoustics
2.2.3. Aluminum Association
2.2.4. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (ASHRAE)
2.2.5. Ceilings and Interior Systems Construction Association (CISCA)
2.2.6. National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA)
2.2.7. Steel Deck Institute (SDI)
2.2.8. Ceiling and Interior System Construction Association (CISCA)
2.2.9. Glass Association of North America (GANA)
2.3. Drawings
XXXXXXXX
3.1. Definitions
3.2. Nomenclature
ADA Americans with Disabilities Act
AIA The American Institute of Architects
Cal-OSHA California Occupational Safety and Health Administration
CSA Civil, Structural, and Architectural
DBD Design Basis Document
DDE Detailed Design Engineering
DIY Do-it-yourself
EGS Engineering Group Supervisor
EIT Engineer-In-Training (Certification)
EPC Engineering – Procurement – Construction
FEED Front-End Engineering Design
G.E. Geotechnical Engineer (Registered/ Certification)
HVAC Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning
ICC International Code Council
IFC Issued for Construction
IFR Issued for Review
ISA International Society of Automation
LABC Los Angeles Building Code
LADBS Los Angeles Department of Building and Safety
MAOP Maximum Allowable Operating Pressure
MBMA Metal Building Manufacturers Association
MSA Meter Set Assembly
NDS National Design Specification (for Wood Construction)
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
NRCA National Roofing Contractors Association
P.E. Professional Engineer (Registered/Certification)
QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control
RR Research Report Number (LADBS)
SE Structural Engineer (Registered/ Certification)
SSI Soil-Structure Interaction
4.1. Purpose
The purpose of Conceptual Design of Duplicated City Center Building (hereafter Building) can be elaborated as follow:
1) Prepare Architectural plans to determining the Building envelopes (Overall Sizes)
2) Determine the minimum required size of lot based on the Building envelope and other planning and zoning requirements
3) Determine the proper Structural System and Structural Materials
4) Determine the proper material of Building (Green Building)
5) Determine the Mechanical and Electrical equipment and devices
6) Determine the required instrumentation including IT and other devices
7) Determine the method of Construction
8) Provide the estimation for bulk material and total man-hour of the Construction (Construction Planning)
9) Provide approximate budget and determine the schedule of Detailed Design phase and Construction (EPC)
4.1. Locations
Figure 1: Considered Locations for the Model Building
The Conceptual Design is considered to be a Model Building that can be constructed at various locations. The Building will be designed in accordance with all applicable codes in the United States.
In this phase, the following locations are considered:
A. State of Utah (City of Kanab and the country around it)
B. State of California (County of LA, County of Orange, and County of San Diego)
4.3. Zoning and Planning Requirements
The minimum Requirement of International Zoning Code [Ref. 2.1.1.1] shall be considered.
4.4. Utilities
Prior to the selection of the site, the utility companies for Water & Sewage, Electricity, Gas and Communication shall be determined.
4.5. Municipality/Public Works
The Municipality of the selected area (Local Jurisdiction City/County) shall be determined and contacted to obtain all applicable codes and regulations.
4.6. Structural Design Considerations
The Design Criteria for Structural Design will be considered as envelope of the criteria for various locations
5.1. Definitions (Architectural)
Table 1 – Occupant Load Factor Based On Function Of Space
5.2. Occupancy of the Building
The Building is designed for Multi-purpose use.
The following will elaborate the floor plans and Occupancy categories:
Table 2 – Occupancy Specifications – Basement Level
1. CBC Table 1004.1.2
2. CBC § 509.3; Incidental use shall not occupy more than 10% of the Building Area of the story in which they are located
Figure 2: Occupancy Determination – Basement Level
Table 3 Occupancy Specifications – Basement Level
Figure 3 – Occupancy Determination – 1st Level (Updated)
Table 4 – Occupancy Specification – 2nd Level
Table 5 – Occupancy Specifications – 3rd Level
Table 6 – Occupancy Specifications – 4th Level
5.3. EGRESS
Number of exits
Figure 4: Spaces with One Exit or Exit Access Doorway
Table 7 Occupancy Specifications Basement And First Floor
Table 8 Occupancy Specifications Second Floor
Table 9 Occupancy Specifications Third Floor
Table 10 Occupancy Specifications Fourth Floor
Stairway
See 1011.2 Width and Capacity
Stairway Width
The width of stairways shall be determined as specified in Section 1005.1, but such width shall not be less than 44 inches (1118 mm). See Section 1007.3 for accessible means of egress stairways.
Exceptions:
1. A width of not less than 36 inches (914 mm) shall be permitted in:
1.1. A stairway that serves an occupant load of 50 or less cumulative for all stories; or
1.2. A stairway that provides egress to the exit discharge solely for the use of Group R-2 occupancies, provided the building it serves is 125 feet (38 100 mm) or less in height, and provided such a stairway serves not more than 30 occupants per floor.
4. Where a stairway lift is installed on stairways serving occupancies in Group R-3, or within dwelling units in occupancies in Group R-2 a clear passage width not less than 20 inches (508 mm) shall be provided. If the seat and platform can be folded when not in use, the distance shall be measured from the folded position.
Door: 1010.1.1
The required capacity of each door opening shall be sufficient for the occupant load thereof and shall provide a minimum clear opening width of 32 inches.
Doors to walk-in freezers and coolers less than 1,000 square feet (93 m2) in area shall have a maximum width of 60 inches (1524 mm).
Table 11 Occupancy Specifications Level 2
5.3.1. Allowable Area
Based on the occupancy classifications considered in Table 1 to Table 5, the Occupancy A2, A3, A4, R2, and S2 are considered for this Building. The following tables show the allowable Area for each occupancy.
5.3.2. Mixed-occupancy, multistory buildings. [CBC §506.2.4]
Each story of a mixed-occupancy building with more than one story above grade plane shall individually comply with the applicable requirements of section 508.1. For buildings with more than three stories above grade plane, the total building area shall be such that the aggregate sum of the ratios of the actual area of each story divided by the allowable area of such stories, determined in accordance with equation 5-3 based on the applicable provisions of section 508.1, shall not exceed three, provided the aggregate sum of the ratios for portions of mixed-occupancy, multistory buildings containing A, E, H, I, L and R occupancies, high-rise buildings, and other applications listed in Section 1.11 regulated by the Office of the State Fire Marshal, including any other associated non-separated occupancies, shall not exceed two.
Placeholder text…
Q: Where can I get more information about your philosophies for world change?
Please take a look at each of these additional pages: (click icons)
Q: Why geodesic domes?
Geodesic domes were chosen for a broad diversity of reasons. First, we wanted a structure that could be purchased and shipped anywhere in the world, were uniquely attractive, and provided large open spaces that big groups of people would feel really comfortable in. Domes are beautiful, purchased as kits, and the curved walls and ceiling (in this case 35 feet or 10.7 meters high in the center) use approximately a third less surface area to enclose the same volume as a traditional box home. Geodesic domes also perform well as passively heated and cooled structures because the aerodynamics of the rounded walls encourage air to travel efficiently around inside the building. The geodesic design is also especially beneficial structurally in that the larger the building, the stronger the dome. The round structures also weather hurricanes and tornados significantly better than box structures.
Q: How does this structure fit into the global transformation and open source goals of One Community?
As this page states, the Duplicable City Center sets an example of how to save money and resources through cooperative and shared laundry, dining and food preparation, and recreation space for over 300 people. It will also produce significant revenue through its rental rooms. In addition to this, the Duplicable City Center is meant to provide a high-end and profitable option for people who either:
With our Highest Good of All philosophy being to provide something for everyone, the above three benefits of this structure specifically hold value for a higher-end and investment-focused demographic. As part of One Community’s global transformation methodology, we see this as an opportunity for corporations and other private investors to start sustainable and self-sufficient teacher/demonstration communities, villages, and cities with a traditional, contractor-buildable, and profitable building like this and then use our same community membership model to provide people with free housing or a potential revenue stream (see “Community Sponsored Business” example) in return for free labor to help build one of the 7 village models.
Investors save money and members have the potential to build themselves a house and/or a revenue stream in return for investing their time (no financial investment). On top of this, both investors and members are contributing to further spreading and sharing teacher/demonstration communities, villages, and cities.
Q: How do you expect to achieve near-100% passive cooling for this structure?
The Duplicable City Center has been designed to meet its cooling needs through exceptional venting combined with the 35-foot high dome ceilings, outstanding insulation (40+ R-value), window and structure positioning to maximize the benefits of property-specific wind patterns, and the ability to shade or cover all South-facing windows during the hottest months. The elevation of our property is also high enough to provide weather that will generally fluctuate between 30-80 Fahrenheit (0 to 25 C). For these reasons, the only non-passive cooling designed into this structure are the large-scale refrigerator and freezer and 2 swamp coolers for cooling the kitchen cooking and cutting/canning/preserving/dishwashing areas.
Q: Why are you designing this structure to be 100% off-grid?
We feel it is important to demonstrate the Duplicable City Center and village models as options that can be constructed in locations without the availability of a connect to the power grid. For this reason, we are first designing the complete One Community energy infrastructure to supply all One Community village and City Center needs without a grid connection. Once these details have been completed and open source shared, we will also conduct and open source share the cost analysis comparison for connecting to the energy grid for backup power in the winter months when solar would normally require generator backup. After this analysis, we will update our plan if on-grid development is determined to be a more sustainable and cost effective option than generators and the additional batteries and solar infrastructure we’d need to function 100% off-grid in the winter months.
Connect with One Community